Travel safety comparison · Africa
South Sudan vs Uganda: safety comparison
vs
South Sudan vs Uganda: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Uganda carries a materially lower safety risk than South Sudan on the composite Warnely score: 45/100 against 82/100, a gap of 37 points. The biggest single category gap is in crime, where Uganda scores 3/5 against South Sudan's 5/5. Women's-safety rating differs: South Sudan is Do Not Travel and Uganda is Exercise Caution.
| 🇸🇸South Sudan | 🇺🇬Uganda | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 82 / 100 | 45 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Do Not Travel | Exercise Increased Caution |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #156 | #113 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Do Not Travel | Exercise Caution |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | illegal | death |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | SSP | UGX |
South Sudan vs Uganda: common questions
Is South Sudan or Uganda safer to visit?
Uganda has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 45/100 vs 82/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is South Sudan or Uganda safer for solo female travellers?
South Sudan is rated Do Not Travel for women's safety; Uganda is rated Exercise Caution. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about South Sudan and Uganda?
South Sudan: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Uganda: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).