Travel safety comparison · Africa
Sudan vs South Sudan: safety comparison
vs
Sudan vs South Sudan: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Sudan and South Sudan have very similar overall Warnely composite scores: 80 and 82. The choice between them is unlikely to be driven by the headline number alone.
| 🇸🇩Sudan | 🇸🇸South Sudan | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 80 / 100 | 82 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Do Not Travel | Do Not Travel |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #161 | #156 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Do Not Travel | Do Not Travel |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | illegal | illegal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | SDG | SSP |
Sudan vs South Sudan: common questions
Is Sudan or South Sudan safer to visit?
Sudan has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 80/100 vs 82/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Sudan or South Sudan safer for solo female travellers?
Sudan is rated Do Not Travel for women's safety; South Sudan is rated Do Not Travel. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Sudan and South Sudan?
Sudan: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). South Sudan: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).