Travel safety comparison · Africa
Eritrea vs Sudan: safety comparison
vs
Eritrea vs Sudan: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Eritrea carries a materially lower safety risk than Sudan on the composite Warnely score: 56/100 against 80/100, a gap of 24 points. The biggest single category gap is in crime, where Eritrea scores 3/5 against Sudan's 5/5. Women's-safety rating differs: Eritrea is Exercise Caution and Sudan is Do Not Travel.
| 🇪🇷Eritrea | 🇸🇩Sudan | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 56 / 100 | 80 / 100 |
| Risk tier | High Risk | Do Not Travel |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #132 | #161 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Do Not Travel |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | illegal | illegal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | ERN | SDG |
Eritrea vs Sudan: common questions
Is Eritrea or Sudan safer to visit?
Eritrea has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 56/100 vs 80/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Eritrea or Sudan safer for solo female travellers?
Eritrea is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; Sudan is rated Do Not Travel. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Eritrea and Sudan?
Eritrea: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Sudan: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).