Rwanda vs South Sudan: safety comparison
Rwanda vs South Sudan: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
| π·πΌRwanda | πΈπΈSouth Sudan | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0β100, lower is safer) | 43 / 100 | 87 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Increased Caution | Do Not Travel |
| UK FCDO advisory | avoid all but essential travel to parts of country | avoid all travel to whole country |
| US State Department advisory | Level 3 (Reconsider Travel) | Level 4 (Do Not Travel) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #91 | #156 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Do Not Travel |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | legal | illegal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | RWF | SSP |
Rwanda vs South Sudan: common questions
Is Rwanda or South Sudan safer to visit?
Rwanda has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 43/100 vs 87/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Rwanda or South Sudan safer for solo female travellers?
Rwanda is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; South Sudan is rated Do Not Travel. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Rwanda and South Sudan?
Rwanda: avoid all but essential travel to parts of country (FCDO), Level 3 (Reconsider Travel) (US State). South Sudan: avoid all travel to whole country (FCDO), Level 4 (Do Not Travel) (US State).
More comparisons
Kenya vs Rwanda · Kenya vs South Sudan · Rwanda vs Tanzania · Ethiopia vs South Sudan · Rwanda vs Uganda · Democratic Republic of Congo vs Rwanda · South Sudan vs Uganda · Sudan vs South Sudan
Planning the trip? Check Rwanda visa requirements and South Sudan visa requirements.