Rwanda vs Uganda: safety comparison
Rwanda vs Uganda: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
| π·πΌRwanda | πΊπ¬Uganda | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0β100, lower is safer) | 43 / 100 | 64 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Increased Caution | High Risk |
| UK FCDO advisory | avoid all but essential travel to parts of country | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 3 (Reconsider Travel) | Level 4 (Do Not Travel) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #91 | #113 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Exercise Caution |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | legal | death |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | RWF | UGX |
Rwanda vs Uganda: common questions
Is Rwanda or Uganda safer to visit?
Rwanda has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 43/100 vs 64/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Rwanda or Uganda safer for solo female travellers?
Rwanda is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; Uganda is rated Exercise Caution. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Rwanda and Uganda?
Rwanda: avoid all but essential travel to parts of country (FCDO), Level 3 (Reconsider Travel) (US State). Uganda: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 4 (Do Not Travel) (US State).
More comparisons
Kenya vs Uganda · Kenya vs Rwanda · Rwanda vs Tanzania · Tanzania vs Uganda · Democratic Republic of Congo vs Rwanda · South Sudan vs Uganda · Rwanda vs South Sudan
Planning the trip? Check Rwanda visa requirements and Uganda visa requirements.