Travel safety comparison · Africa
Rwanda vs Uganda: safety comparison
vs
Rwanda vs Uganda: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Rwanda carries a materially lower safety risk than Uganda on the composite Warnely score: 27/100 against 45/100, a gap of 18 points. The biggest single category gap is in crime, where Rwanda scores 2/5 against Uganda's 3/5.
| 🇷🇼Rwanda | 🇺🇬Uganda | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 27 / 100 | 45 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Normal Caution | Exercise Increased Caution |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #91 | #113 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Exercise Caution |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | legal | death |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | RWF | UGX |
Rwanda vs Uganda: common questions
Is Rwanda or Uganda safer to visit?
Rwanda has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 27/100 vs 45/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Rwanda or Uganda safer for solo female travellers?
Rwanda is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; Uganda is rated Exercise Caution. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Rwanda and Uganda?
Rwanda: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Uganda: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).