Travel safety comparison · Africa
Eritrea vs South Sudan: safety comparison
vs
Eritrea vs South Sudan: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Eritrea carries a materially lower safety risk than South Sudan on the composite Warnely score: 56/100 against 82/100, a gap of 26 points. The biggest single category gap is in crime, where Eritrea scores 3/5 against South Sudan's 5/5. Women's-safety rating differs: Eritrea is Exercise Caution and South Sudan is Do Not Travel.
| 🇪🇷Eritrea | 🇸🇸South Sudan | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 56 / 100 | 82 / 100 |
| Risk tier | High Risk | Do Not Travel |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #132 | #156 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Do Not Travel |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | illegal | illegal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | ERN | SSP |
Eritrea vs South Sudan: common questions
Is Eritrea or South Sudan safer to visit?
Eritrea has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 56/100 vs 82/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Eritrea or South Sudan safer for solo female travellers?
Eritrea is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; South Sudan is rated Do Not Travel. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Eritrea and South Sudan?
Eritrea: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). South Sudan: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).