Travel safety comparison ยท Africa

Republic of Congo vs Cameroon: safety comparison

vs

Republic of Congo vs Cameroon: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.

ยท How Warnely scores risk โ†’
Republic of Congo sits a little lower on the Warnely composite score than Cameroon (47 against 56), but the gap is small enough that the practical difference comes down to category-by-category detail rather than the headline. The biggest single category gap is in terrorism, where Republic of Congo scores 2/5 against Cameroon's 3/5.
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌRepublic of Congo ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒCameroon
Warnely composite (0โ€“100, lower is safer) 47 / 100 56 / 100
Risk tier Exercise Increased Caution High Risk
UK FCDO advisory No active advisory No active advisory
US State Department advisory Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions)
Global Peace Index rank #103 #137
Drug law Severe (long sentences) Severe (long sentences)
Women's safety rating Exercise Caution Exercise Caution
LGBTQ+ legal status legal illegal
Tap water n/a n/a
Currency XAF XAF
Full guide

Is Republic of Congo safe to visit in 2026?

Full guide

Is Cameroon safe to visit in 2026?

Republic of Congo vs Cameroon: common questions

Is Republic of Congo or Cameroon safer to visit?

Republic of Congo has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 47/100 vs 56/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.

Is Republic of Congo or Cameroon safer for solo female travellers?

Republic of Congo is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; Cameroon is rated Exercise Caution. Read the full guides for city-level detail.

What do FCDO and US State Department say about Republic of Congo and Cameroon?

Republic of Congo: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Cameroon: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).

← All country comparisons