Travel safety comparison · Africa
Angola vs Republic of Congo: safety comparison
vs
Angola vs Republic of Congo: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Angola and Republic of Congo have very similar overall Warnely composite scores: 45 and 47. The choice between them is unlikely to be driven by the headline number alone.
| 🇦🇴Angola | 🇨🇬Republic of Congo | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 45 / 100 | 47 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Increased Caution | Exercise Increased Caution |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #76 | #103 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Exercise Caution |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | legal | legal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | AOA | XAF |
Angola vs Republic of Congo: common questions
Is Angola or Republic of Congo safer to visit?
Angola has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 45/100 vs 47/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Angola or Republic of Congo safer for solo female travellers?
Angola is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; Republic of Congo is rated Exercise Caution. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Angola and Republic of Congo?
Angola: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Republic of Congo: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).