Travel safety comparison · Africa
Malawi vs Zambia: safety comparison
vs
Malawi vs Zambia: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Malawi and Zambia have very similar overall Warnely composite scores: 37 and 36. The choice between them is unlikely to be driven by the headline number alone. The biggest single category gap is in infrastructure, where Zambia scores 2/5 against Malawi's 3/5.
| 🇲🇼Malawi | 🇿🇲Zambia | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 37 / 100 | 36 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Increased Caution | Exercise Increased Caution |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #71 | #64 |
| Drug law | Severe (long sentences) | Severe (long sentences) |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Exercise Caution |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | illegal | illegal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | MWK | ZMW |
Malawi vs Zambia: common questions
Is Malawi or Zambia safer to visit?
Zambia has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 36/100 vs 37/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Malawi or Zambia safer for solo female travellers?
Malawi is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; Zambia is rated Exercise Caution. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Malawi and Zambia?
Malawi: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Zambia: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).