Travel safety comparison · Latin America & the Caribbean
Chile vs Paraguay: safety comparison
vs
Chile vs Paraguay: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.
Chile sits a little lower on the Warnely composite score than Paraguay (29 against 38), but the gap is small enough that the practical difference comes down to category-by-category detail rather than the headline. The biggest single category gap is in terrorism, where Chile scores 1/5 against Paraguay's 2/5.
| 🇨🇱Chile | 🇵🇾Paraguay | |
|---|---|---|
| Warnely composite (0–100, lower is safer) | 29 / 100 | 38 / 100 |
| Risk tier | Exercise Normal Caution | Exercise Increased Caution |
| UK FCDO advisory | No active advisory | No active advisory |
| US State Department advisory | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) | Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) |
| Global Peace Index rank | #62 | #75 |
| Drug law | Strict | Strict |
| Women's safety rating | Exercise Caution | Exercise Caution |
| LGBTQ+ legal status | marriage | legal |
| Tap water | n/a | n/a |
| Currency | CLP | PYG |
Chile vs Paraguay: common questions
Is Chile or Paraguay safer to visit?
Chile has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 29/100 vs 38/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.
Is Chile or Paraguay safer for solo female travellers?
Chile is rated Exercise Caution for women's safety; Paraguay is rated Exercise Caution. Read the full guides for city-level detail.
What do FCDO and US State Department say about Chile and Paraguay?
Chile: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Paraguay: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).