Travel safety comparison ยท Oceania

Australia vs Papua New Guinea: safety comparison

vs

Australia vs Papua New Guinea: side-by-side safety comparison. Risk scores, FCDO + US State advisories, drug law, women's safety, LGBTQ+ status.

ยท How Warnely scores risk โ†’
Australia carries a materially lower safety risk than Papua New Guinea on the composite Warnely score: 13/100 against 57/100, a gap of 44 points. The biggest single category gap is in crime, where Australia scores 1/5 against Papua New Guinea's 4/5. Drug law diverges sharply: Papua New Guinea carries a tier-severe regime against Australia's more permissive framework.
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บAustralia ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฌPapua New Guinea
Warnely composite (0โ€“100, lower is safer) 13 / 100 57 / 100
Risk tier Very Safe High Risk
UK FCDO advisory No active advisory No active advisory
US State Department advisory Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions)
Global Peace Index rank #18 #116
Drug law Strict Severe (long sentences)
Women's safety rating Generally Safe Generally Safe
LGBTQ+ legal status marriage illegal
Tap water n/a n/a
Currency AUD PGK
Full guide

Is Australia safe to visit in 2026?

Full guide

Is Papua New Guinea safe to visit in 2026?

Australia vs Papua New Guinea: common questions

Is Australia or Papua New Guinea safer to visit?

Australia has the lower Warnely composite risk score: 13/100 vs 57/100 (lower is safer). Both scores factor in crime, terrorism, natural disasters, health, civil unrest, and infrastructure.

Is Australia or Papua New Guinea safer for solo female travellers?

Australia is rated Generally Safe for women's safety; Papua New Guinea is rated Generally Safe. Read the full guides for city-level detail.

What do FCDO and US State Department say about Australia and Papua New Guinea?

Australia: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State). Papua New Guinea: No active advisory (FCDO), Level 1 (Exercise Normal Precautions) (US State).

← All country comparisons